Outcome letters have two sheets: the first is a 'letter' and the second shows the outcome of the review. This document explains the marks and grades on the second sheet.
For linear, you get one outcome letter per review. The 'second sheet' looks like this:
The top row is the specification and shows:
Please note
In the above example, Paper 2F was reviewed and Paper 1F was not. Paper 1F just shows the 'new' (current) mark. Paper 2F shows the original (old) mark as well as the new.
For unitary/modular specifications, you get one letter per reviewed unit/module, per candidate. So, if a candidate is having two modules reviewed in a specification, you will get two outcome letters posted separately: one per module.
If a candidate aggregated, the outcome letters will be produced after all the requested modules have been reviewed and re-aggregation has occurred. As such, the specification grade/UMS will be the same on all the outcome letters.
The contents and layout of the 'second sheet' will depend on whether the candidate has aggregated in the session, and thus whether there is a specification grade involved. (All the marks reported are UMS marks.)
The top row will show the specification information:
The second row will be for the reviewed module covered by the letter (remember: you get one letter per reviewed module). It will show:
Please note:
A letter may show that the specification grade or overall UMS mark has changed without the module marks on that particular letter having changed. Here, the candidate will have had more than one module reviewed and the other module mark, detailed in its own letter, has changed enough to increase the specification grade UMS.