Non-exam assessment administration
The non-exam assessment (NEA) for this specification is performance and composition.
Visit aqa.org.uk/8271 for detailed information about all aspects of NEA administration.
The head of the school or college is responsible for making sure that NEA is conducted in line with our instructions and Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) instructions.
Supervising and authenticating
To meet Ofqual’s qualification criteria and conditions, the requirements set out in Assessment components of the specification must be adhered to. Evidence of authentication for each student must include:
- a Candidate record form (CRF), signed by the student and their teacher to confirm that all the student’s Non-exam assessment evidence submitted is their own work and was conducted under the conditions laid down by this specification
- audio recordings of each student's performance/composition, which identify the candidate by name and candidate number.
Students must have sufficient direct supervision to ensure that the work submitted can be confidently authenticated as their own. This means that you must review the progress of work during its production to see how it develops.
Any work produced without supervision, for example outside of the classroom, should be compared to work produced with supervision.
In comparing the student's work, consideration must be given to the consistency in levels of skill demonstrated.
Work that cannot be confidently authenticated must not be included in the student's submission.
You are required to provide details of the support the student received on the CRF and sign the authentication statement. If the statement is not signed, we cannot accept the student’s work for assessment.
Submitting NEA evidence and marks to AQA
You must send all your students' NEA evidence (set out in Assessment components and Supervising and authenticating) to the moderator for moderation and marks to AQA by the date given at aqa.org.uk/keydates
You must show clearly how marks have been awarded against the assessment criteria in this specification. Your comments must help the moderator see, as precisely as possible, where you think the students have met the assessment criteria. You must:
- record your comments on the Candidate Record Form (CRF)
- check that the correct marks are written on the CRF and that the total is correct.
The moderator re-marks a sample of the evidence and compares this with the marks you have provided to check whether any changes are needed to bring the marking in line with our agreed standards. Any changes to marks will normally keep your rank order but, where major inconsistencies are found, we reserve the right to change the rank order.
Please inform your students of the AQA regulations concerning malpractice. They must not:
- submit work that is not their own
- lend work to other students
- allow other students access to, or use of, their own independently-sourced source material
- include work copied directly from books, the internet or other sources without acknowledgement
- submit work that is word-processed by a third person without acknowledgement
- include inappropriate, offensive or obscene material.
These actions constitute malpractice and a penalty will be given (for example, disqualification).
If you identify malpractice before the student signs the declaration of authentication, you don’t need to report it to us. Please deal with it in accordance with your school or college’s internal procedures. We expect schools and colleges to treat such cases very seriously.
If you identify malpractice after the student has signed the declaration of authentication, the head of your school or college must submit full details of the case to us at the earliest opportunity. Please complete the form JCQ/M1, available from the JCQ website at jcq.org.uk
You must record details of any work which is not the student’s own on the front of the assessment booklet or other appropriate place.
You should consult your exams officer about these procedures.
We will provide support for using the marking criteria and developing appropriate tasks through teacher standardisation.
For further information about teacher standardisation visit our website at aqa.org.uk/8271
In the following situations teacher standardisation is essential. We will send you an invitation to complete teacher standardisation if:
- moderation from the previous year indicates a serious misinterpretation of the requirements
- a significant adjustment was made to the marks in the previous year
- your school or college is new to this specification.
For further support and advice please speak to your adviser. Email your subject team at firstname.lastname@example.org for details of your adviser.
You must ensure that you have consistent marking standards for all students. One person must manage this process and they must sign the Centre declaration sheet to confirm that internal standardisation has taken place.
Internal standardisation may involve:
- all teachers marking some sample pieces of work to identify differences in marking standards
- discussing any differences in marking at a training meeting for all teachers involved
- referring to reference and archive material, such as previous work or examples from our teacher standardisation.
Factors affecting individual students
For advice and guidance about arrangements for any of your students, please email us as early as possible at email@example.com
Occasional absence: you should be able to accept the occasional absence of students by making sure they have the chance to make up what they have missed. You may organise an alternative supervised session for students who were absent at the time you originally arranged.
Lost work: if work is lost you must tell us how and when it was lost and who was responsible, using our special consideration online service at aqa.org.uk/eaqa
Special help: where students need special help which goes beyond normal learning support, please use the CRF to tell us so that this help can be taken into account during moderation.
Students who move schools: students who move from one school or college to another during the course sometimes need additional help to meet the requirements. How you deal with this depends on when the move takes place. If it happens early in the course, the new school or college should be responsible for the work. If it happens late in the course, it may be possible to arrange for the moderator to assess the work as a student who was ‘Educated Elsewhere’.
School and college consortia
If you are in a consortium of schools or colleges with joint teaching arrangements (where students from different schools and colleges have been taught together but entered through the school or college at which they are on roll), you must let us know by:
- filling in the Application for Centre Consortium Arrangements for centre-assessed work, which is available from the JCQ website jcq.org.uk
- appointing a consortium co-ordinator who can speak to us on behalf of all schools and colleges in the consortium. If there are different co-ordinators for different specifications, a copy of the form must be sent in for each specification.
We will allocate the same moderator to all schools and colleges in the consortium and treat the students as a single group for moderation.
We will return your students’ work to you after the exams. You will also receive a report when the results are issued, which will give feedback on the appropriateness of the tasks set, interpretation of the marking criteria and how students performed in general.
We will give you the final marks when the results are issued.
We may need to use some of your students’ work to meet Ofqual requirements for awarding, archiving or standardisation purposes. Unless you specifically ask us to, we will not return your students’ work to you after the exams.