Most chosen general qualifications exam board in England.

  • About AQA

  • Centre Services

  • Join Us

  • Contact Us

AQA
  • Subjects
  • Qualifications
  • Professional Development
  • Exams Admin
  • Services
  • Search
  • Subjects

  • Qualifications

  • Professional Development

  • Exams Admin

  • Services

  • About AQA

  • Centre Services

  • Join Us

  • Contact Us

  • Log in

Subjects

  • Accounting

  • Art and Design

  • Biology

  • Business

  • Chemistry

  • Computer Science

  • Dance

  • Design and Technology

  • Drama

  • Economics

  • English

  • Food preparation and Nutrition

  • French

  • Geography

  • German

  • History

  • Law

  • Mathematics

  • Media Studies

  • Music

  • Physical Education

  • Physics

  • Politics

  • Psychology

  • Religious Studies

  • Science

  • Sociology

  • Spanish

  • All subjects

GCSEs

  • Biology (8461)

  • Chemistry (8462)

  • Combined Science: Trilogy (8464)

  • English Language (8700)

  • English Literature (8702)

  • Geography (8035)

  • History (8145)

  • Mathematics (8300)

  • See all GCSEs

AS and A-levels

  • Biology (7401)

  • Business (7131)

  • Chemistry (7404)

  • Geography (7037)

  • History (7041)

  • Physics (7407)

  • Psychology (7181)

  • Sociology (7191)

  • See all AS and A-Levels

Other qualifications

  • Applied Generals

  • AQA Certificate Mathematics

  • Entry Level Certificates

  • Project Qualifications

  • Unit Award Scheme

  • All qualifications

Our training

  • Course finder

  • About our training

  • Online training

  • Face-to-face training

  • In-school training

  • Inside assessment

Courses by theme

  • Effective exam prep

  • Exams officers

  • Getting started

  • Unit Award Scheme

Courses by subject

  • English

  • Mathematics

  • Science

  • Languages

  • Design and Technology

  • Physical Education

  • Geography

  • History

  • All professional development

Dates

  • Dates and timetables

  • Key dates

Non-exam assessment (NEA)

  • NEA, coursework and controlled assessment

  • Deadlines for non-exam assessment

  • Record forms

  • Submit marks

Exams

  • Entries

  • Entry fees

  • Exams guidance

  • Question papers and stationery

  • Access arrangements

  • Special consideration

Results

  • Results days

  • Results slips

  • Grade boundaries

  • Results statistics

  • Post-results services

  • Exam certificates

  • All Exams Admin

Assessment Services

  • Centre Services

  • Associate Extranet

  • Become an associate

Products

  • All About Maths

  • Alpha Plus

  • Data Insights

  • Exampro

  • Project Q

  • Stride Maths

  • Testbase

  • Unit Award Scheme

News and Insights

  • AQI research and insight

  • News

  • Inside exams podcast

AQA
  • Become an examiner
  • Switch to AQA
  • Contact Us
  • Join us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Accessibility
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • Cookie notice
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube

©AQA 2025 | Company number: 03644723 | Registered office: Devas Street, Manchester, M15 6EX | AQA is not responsible for the content of external sites

AQA Education has obtained an injunction preventing interference with public examinations. This notice is to alert you to the injunction, so that you are aware of it and can make submissions about it if you wish to do so.

  1. Home
  2. About Us
  3. Our Research
  4. Research Library
  5. Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem

Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem

Share this page

  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem

Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem

13 Nov 2012

PDF | 2.04 MB

Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem

By Robert Hales

Abstract

The number of candidates for whom mark data is available at the time of an award is less than the total entry in the vast majority of cases — the relative difference between these is referred to as the Percentage Fully Processed (PFP).

At some point between award and publication of results, the mark data for the additional candidates will become available and will have some effect on the percentage outcomes at each grade — the outcomes will drift, known as Post-Awarding Drift (PAD). This effect has been the focus of previous studies, where empirical and simulation analyses were undertaken.

These studies found some relationship between the PFP and PAD, which further resulted in a recommendation of lowering the minimally required PFP (MRPFP) at award from 85% to 70% across all specifications in order to avoid PAD (although 75% was ultimately chosen).

The aim of this study is to investigate PAD from an analytical perspective in order that this MRPFP might be chosen in a more substantiated way. The results show that the PAD as observed empirically or by simulation can be analytically explained, at the expense of making some practical assumptions, and that the MRPFP will vary from unit to unit. This is mainly driven by the size of the total entry so that in the extreme cases of very large-entry units (e.g. total entry of 400,000) the MRPFP is less than 1%.

Additionally, the methodology was explored during the summer 2012 awarding series with the primary aim of facilitating decisions being made about units with low PFPs. Discussion is also provided around the use of additional information that is available during award preparation that can better inform the decisions made around the MRPFP.

How to cite

Hales, R. (2012). Fully Processed candidates: an analytical solution to the Post-Awarding Drift problem. Manchester: AQA Centre for Education Research and Policy.

Keywords

  • Transparency